Collective punishment is a war crime

0
63

 

The long line at the Qalandia checkpoint on Monday was one of the first signs of the added collective punishment that the Israeli army was now instructed to impose on the Palestinian population. When my turn finally arrived I drove up to the soldiers hoping finally to be allowed into Ramallah. A woman soldier was preparing some type of sandwich and her colleague ordered me to return. I tried to plead with him that my papers were in order but he kept insisting that I return. I backed my car up and after a wait I decided to walk by foot with my Israeli issued press card and my travel documents in hand. The young Israeli soldier again screamed at me to return. When I insisted to know why he pointed to his female partner eating away at her sandwich. Wait till she is done with her breakfast he replied.

The answer surprised me because in 35 years of living under Israeli occupation I don’t remember ever being delayed because a soldier was munching on a sandwich. I know many other places were you might be asked to wait in line while staffers had their tea or breakfast, but this was a first for me.

Israeli soldiers at the Qalandia checkpoint were clearly fulfilling new orders coming from the Sharon administration. To hurt Palestinians in any way shape or form. A delegation that was invited to London was not allowed to travel to the United Kingdom. A PLO central council meeting that was supposed to discuss the Palestinian constitution was not allowed to convene, even Palestinians invited to an Israeli-Palestinian conference about Palestinian elections, in Jerusalem sponsored by the American University were told that there permits have been rescinded.

Of all the decisions, the one that upset many Palestinians was the decision to bar Palestinians ages 16-35 from traveling within the Palestinian territories as well as from Palestine to any part of the world. This collective punishment has literally made Palestinian cities a major prison for a large chunk of the Palestinian population. After all what is the fault of the student, the worker, the man, the woman, the supporter of the peace process or the opponent of it to be barred from the inalienable right of the freedom of movement.

The Fourth Geneva Convention, which details what an occupying power is or is not allowed to do to the civilian population under its control clearly stipulate that collective punishment is forbidden. If there was a war crimes tribunal, the Israeli officials that make such a decision as well as those who carry it out could be convicted of committing a crime of war.

Even more difficult than the crime of restricting the travel of individuals is the crime of demolishing the home of the families of militant Palestinians. In a spat of 24 hours last week Israel demolished more than 30 homes in the Rafah area. These are homes to hundreds of Palestinian men women and children. Some of them are homes that the families have waited a lifetime until they were built. And the destruction had nothing to do with what those children living in the homes. But rather they were destroyed as a punishment and with the Israeli hope that it can deter Palestinians from carrying out suicide attacks.

The statement by AL Aqsa brigades taking responsibility for Sunday’s double suicide attack in Tel Aviv was rather interesting. It stated that the attacks were in part a response to the Israeli policy of house demolitions. House demolitions therefore not only useless as a deterrent but they seem to have been an instigator of more attacks against Israelis. That attack was odd on another front. While the Fatah leadership has been busy trying to convince Hamas and other radical groups not to carry out attacks against civilians, this attack clearly carried out by Fatah cadres embarrassed the leadership, which tried unsuccessfully to claim that the perpetuators had nothing to do with Fatah. It turns out that this most deadly attack by Fatah in over 25 years seem to have more than one target. While it was carried out against Israeli civilians, analysts believe that it was directed at certain segments of the Fatah movement itself. One source has said that the attack was meant to send a message to the Palestinian Minister of Interior Hani Al Hassan who has been given the difficult responsibility of trying to pacify radical elements within the mainstream Palestinian movement.

Daoud Kuttab is a Palestinian journalist from Jerusalem. He is the director of the Institute of Modern Media at Al Quds University which owns and runs Al Quds Educational Television. In May 2001, Mr. Kuttab received the International Press Institute’s award as one of fifty press freedom heroes in the last fifty years.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.