The
Viennese Jewish shrinks decided to disinvite
the American Palestinian Professor Edward Said, who had been called
to lecture them in memory of Sigmund Freud. The Professor had
been seen throwing a stone towards an Israeli
border. The psychiatrists said it speaks a lot about his subconscious.
They would never throw a rock, as the wild Arab from Columbia University;
they prefer Sharon’s missiles.
I
think it is a right approach, and it should be applied not only to
professor Said. In the far-away 1969, Phillip Roth decided to probe the
subconscious of his contemporary American Jew. In the novel, Portnoy’s
Complaint, Roth’s hero, Alexander Portnoy, lies on the psychiatrist’s couch
and tells of his inner feelings, domineering
mother and adolescent sex. What would a modern Portnoy blubber on the
newest reclining couch model 2001?
We
can find this
out by turning towards the press. Philip Weiss[i]
in the New York Observer noted that the Jews are to politics and media
what the blacks are to basketball. The leading media powerhouses like the
New York Times Corporation and the Washington Post are fully kosher, owned
by Jews and a substantial majority of the editorials and the op-eds are
written by Jews. They are representative of the Jewish American opinion.
With a very few exceptions,
they are supportive of Israel, its policies towards the Palestinians and
its brave ruler, general Sharon.
The
situation in our land is well known. The Jews rule supreme. The local
non-Jewish inhabitants have few rights. The majority of them is
disenfranchised. Their property is seized at will and their sources of
independent livelihood are destroyed. Their cities are besieged, activists
assassinated, women and children starved. They have no access to public
media, to welfare; they are not allowed to even go to the beach. None of
this is secret. It is freely discussed in the Israeli media.
It
would be a gross exaggeration to say that the Jews of Israel hate goys and
wish them all gone. To borrow the expression of Conrad Black, the owner of
British and Canadian newspapers, it would be ‘a lie worthy of Goebbels’.
Israel imports hundreds of thousands of goys and shiksas: Chinese, Thai,
Romanians, Ukrainians, Russians and Africans. In just the last few months,
the Israeli Ministry of Labour issued thousands of new permits for guest
workers. The Jews of Israel welcome goys, as long as they have no rights,
make no demands and agree to work for minimal wage. At the first
objection, they are taken by force to the first plane back home.
That
is the country adored by William Safire, Tom Friedman and other Jews in
the mainstream media. ‘Tell me what you like, and I’ll tell you what
you are’, goes the Latin adage. The pro-Israel position of the American
Jews in the media is a good indication of their subconscious feelings
towards the world at large.
Their
favourite neo-liberal globalist trend is but a tendency to turn the whole
world, including the United States, into a Palestine with a small ruling
class, big security machine and voiceless impoverished natives. But let us
give their due to the gentlemen of the press. They could be worse. The
more vocal part of American Jewry considers them rather soft. The US
correspondent of Haaretz in Washington, Nitzan Horovitz, writes in
today’s edition (March 16, 2001), “The Israeli lobby in the US (AIPAC)
is more intransigent[ii]
than any government of Israel, including that of Sharon.” It is a Jewish
supremacist organisation, according to Yossi Beilin, an Israeli
ex-minister who is not much of a liberal himself.
What
do they hate in Palestinians? The Palestinians have roots, they are living
in harmony with their environment, they love their villages, they stick to
their land, they can live without Jewish guidance. The Jewish supremacists
wish to destroy their society, to confiscate their land and turn them into
slaves sweating in the Jewish factories. If that is what Portnoy-2001
feels about Palestinians, why would he feel any different about other
goys? A good Viennese shrink would pronounce him sick and possibly
dangerous to his neighbours. He is as sick as any bigot of Ku Klux Klan,
but much more influential due to his control over the media.
What
is the source of Portnoy’s influence? Why did he change so much since
1969? Phillip Weiss explains it by the success of the Jews to break
through the barriers, to enrich themselves and to occupy the commanding
positions in the establishment. He writes, “I don’t claim to know how
Jewish the membership of the establishment is. Twenty percent, 50 percent?
I’m guessing 30”. Even 30% would be sufficient to promote any idea, if
the other 70% have no interest in the subject. In many financial
companies, a 10% controlling share is as good as total ownership, as the
rest is divided among small shareholders.
In
the absence of solid statistics for the US, it is instructive to consider
the economy of Apartheid-era
South Africa. The Economist, hardly a ‘hate publication’, estimated
that the Jews who constituted 0.03% of the population owned sixty percent
of that rich country’s market capitalization. All other players, Anglos,
Boers, Indians and native Africans competed for the remaining 40%.
The
power of money is translated into the rule over the minds by the feudal
structure of the media. At the peak, there are media lords, the
proprietors. They delegate authority to their faithful retainers, the
chief editors, who in turn, choose loyal soldiers. The structure does not
stand alone, but links to
the financial and trading structures, the main ad-suppliers. The
ad-suppliers are more important than the readers. In England, the Daily
Herald, a newspaper targeted at a working class constituency, went
bankrupt. Although it had five times as many readers as The Times, it only
attracted half the advertising revenues. Advertisements account for
approximately 75% of the revenue of an average newspaper. In the case of
Radio and TV broadcasters, that figure leaps to almost 100%. It is no
wonder that the media is accountable to its ‘paying’ patrons, the
privileged few who are members of an elite club.
Contrary
to the conventional wisdom, the media is not the message. The media is not
a line of business, either. Lev Chernoi, a Russian-Israeli billionaire who
sold his vast media empire to another Jewish tycoon, Mr. Berezovsky, put
it concisely in a recent interview: “Media is politics”. The media is
a means of shaping public consensus; of swaying the consciousness of a
nation. Once, the readership provided a feedback, not anymore. Ordinary
people still own most of the body parts of America and they are the
muscle, but the nerve system and the brain have been taken over by the
club of media lords and the managers of finance and trade, a new dominant
power in the world. They decide what Americans think. Americans enforce
their decision how we should manage our planet, from the rain forests of
the Amazon to the last besieged Palestinian village.
The
Club disposed with the pretence of the pluralism in press.
Russian politicians and journalists visiting the US often express
amazement at how in this huge and heterogeneous country the scope of
expressed opinions is so narrow. “You succeeded where the communists
failed”, is a frequent refrain. Indeed, the differences between American
newspaper coverage and TV News have all but disappeared.
Noam
Chomsky recently wrote, “the editors of the NY Times, and their
brethren, have refused - not "missed," but refused to publish a
single word about the sending of unprecedented numbers of military
helicopters to Israel. Last week, the latest $.5 billion deal was struck
between the Pentagon and the IDF for more advanced Apaches. They
recognize how the (US) population is likely to react. To date, the total
coverage of this massive transfer of public funds has been one opinion
piece in a newspaper in Raleigh, North Carolina. I've actually attempted
to personally contact editors I've known for years. No use.
The discipline, and uniformity, are really impressive. People who
thought that Stalin had reached the limits of totalitarianism are quite
wrong”.
Well,
Joseph Stalin had no such compliant media machine or the modern technology
at his disposal. Its potential is not fully realized yet, as the three
major networks plan to launch one united and unified news programme every
night, to spread its message to every house in America. A painter Diane
Harvey wrote in despair: “its main technique is through feeding the
public an entire world-view made out of toxic substitutes for information
and truth. The 360-degree, surround-sound World Lie most people believe
is built and sustained by the non-stop flow of highly purposeful,
integrated and carefully directed fabrications. The spirit of truth has
departed, an upgraded version of global totalitarianism has been
coalescing into a new death-grip on human freedom” [iii].
Paradoxically,
this machine is vulnerable as it is too formidable. Subjugation and
destruction of Palestine is but one of its applications. Do not ask for
whom the bell tolls, it tolls for you, as no man is an island, said the
Elizabethan poet, John Donne, proclaiming the common humanity of Man.
These words sent Ernest Hemingway to fight for freedom in Spain in 1936,
as freedom is indivisible. We repeated these words in 1968, we should
repeat it now. The struggle for freedom in the US and the battle for
Palestine are but one war.
Whenever
the Almighty sends a malaise, says a Jewish wisdom, He sends the cure for
it. The cure lies in democracy. The media should be returned to people,
taken out of the rich men’s hands. Israel/Palestine should be
democratised, equal rights provided to Jew and Gentile alike. It would
cure the New Complaint of Portnoy.
Notes:
[i]
New York
Observer, 22.01.01
[ii]
In Israeli
parlance, the Jewish supremacists are called ‘right-wing’, while
national moderates are called ‘left-wing’, though this division has no
connection to their social positions.
[iii]
http://www.rense.com/general8/harv.htm
(Mr. Israel
Shamir, is one of best-known and most respected
Russian Israeli writer and journalist. He wrote for Haaretz,
BBC,
Pravda and translated Agnon, Joyce and Homer into Russian. He
lives in Tel Aviv and writes a weekly column in the Vesti, the
biggest
Russian-language paper in Israel.)
Source:
by courtesy & © 2001 Israel
Shamir
by the same author: