Sign in
  • Home
  • Perspectives
  • Articles
  • Columns
  • Platform
  • Poetry
    • Literature
  • Shop
    • Cart
    • My account
  • Give
    • Donation Confirmation
  • Contribute
Sign in
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
Search
62.6 F
Los Angeles
Thursday, December 5, 2019
  • Sign in / Join
  • Contact MMN
  • en English
    af Afrikaanssq Albanianam Amharicar Arabichy Armenianaz Azerbaijanieu Basquebe Belarusianbn Bengalibs Bosnianbg Bulgarianca Catalanceb Cebuanony Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)co Corsicanhr Croatiancs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englisheo Esperantoet Estoniantl Filipinofi Finnishfr Frenchfy Frisiangl Galicianka Georgiande Germanel Greekgu Gujaratiht Haitian Creoleha Hausahaw Hawaiianiw Hebrewhi Hindihmn Hmonghu Hungarianis Icelandicig Igboid Indonesianga Irishit Italianja Japanesejw Javanesekn Kannadakk Kazakhkm Khmerko Koreanku Kurdish (Kurmanji)ky Kyrgyzlo Laola Latinlv Latvianlt Lithuanianlb Luxembourgishmk Macedonianmg Malagasyms Malayml Malayalammt Maltesemi Maorimr Marathimn Mongolianmy Myanmar (Burmese)ne Nepalino Norwegianps Pashtofa Persianpl Polishpt Portuguesepa Punjabiro Romanianru Russiansm Samoangd Scottish Gaelicsr Serbianst Sesothosn Shonasd Sindhisi Sinhalask Slovaksl Slovenianso Somalies Spanishsu Sudanesesw Swahilisv Swedishtg Tajikta Tamilte Teluguth Thaitr Turkishuk Ukrainianur Urduuz Uzbekvi Vietnamesecy Welshxh Xhosayi Yiddishyo Yorubazu Zulu
Sign in
Welcome! Log into your account
Forgot your password? Get help
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Media Monitors Network (MMN) Media Monitors Network (MMN)
Media Monitors Network (MMN)
  • Home
  • Perspectives
    • The Flower - Pakistan Monument at Night

      Supreme Court’s attempt to destabilize the government of Imran Khan

      United Kingdom

      Britain’s Chief Rabbi is helping to stoke antisemitism

      Benjamin Netanyahu

      Is Netanyahu ready to inflame war to escape his legal troubles?

      Disappearing Palestine

      Trump’s Green Light for Israeli Settlements is an endorsement of Racist…

      Globe Algeria Niger Mali Africa

      ISIS in Mozambique: Is it Africa’s turn now?

  • Articles
    • Man studying religious book

      Ishmael and Isaac: An Essay on the Divergent Moral Economies of…

      Mahmoud Abbas

      May Your Home Be Destroyed

      Netanyahu Lighting Hanukah Candles with His Wife and Sons

      Bibi’s Son or: Three Men in a Car

      The Map of Greater Israel

      The Man Who Jumped

      West Bank - Palestine

      Cry, Beloved Country

  • Columns
    • Donald Trump

      Trump Is Dismantling the International Order

      United States Capitol Building, Washington, D.C.

      When Progressives in Congress Let Us Down, We Should Push Back

      Benjamin Netanyahu

      Netanyahu’s Real Crimes

      Joe Biden

      Joe Biden’s AstroTurf Campaign

      Gaza Crisis

      The Cycle of Death Continues

  • Platform
    • Hanukkah Lights

      Hanukkah is not hypocrisy

      The Washington Post

      “Preemptive war could risk millions of casualties. But….”

      When they shout: "We strongly condemn…"

      68

      Why Iran won’t attack Israel

      Is One Iraqi’s Self-Hatred Newsworthy?

  • Poetry
    • Literature
  • Shop
    • Cart
    • My account
  • Give
    • Donation Confirmation
  • Contribute
Home Perspectives Insurgency in Iraq fractures Bush’s relationship with his military
  • Perspectives

Insurgency in Iraq fractures Bush’s relationship with his military

By
Abid Mustafa
-
June 24, 2005
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Linkedin
ReddIt
Email
Print
Tumblr
Telegram
Mix
VK
Digg
LINE
Viber

    Amid growing domestic and international criticism against his Iraq policy, President Bush issued a statement to dispel the impression that Iraq was faltering. On 20/6/05 he said, “We’re making progress toward the goal, which is, on the one hand, a political process moving forward in Iraq and, on the other hand, the Iraqis capable of defending themselves.” He also gave no indication about a timetable for withdrawing US troops from Iraq, except that Iraq was preoccupying his mind. He said, “I think about Iraq every day, every single day.”

    A close study of Bush’s statements regarding the political process and security situation in Iraq appears to contradict the reality in Iraq. Till now, the Bush administration has been unable to accomplish any of the goals it set out before the invasion of Iraq or in the aftermath of the collapse of the Baath regime.

    The failure to discover any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, touted as one of the primary reasons for going to war has blighted the America’s credibility around the world. Likewise the complete collapse of security surrounding Iraq’s oil wells and pipelines has meant that the administration has been unable to fulfil its commitment to American oil companies. This swiftly led Bush to modify his initial goals and he announced plans to democratize Iraq. This provided the administration with some brief respite, but the spike in the insurgency after the Iraqi elections has put an end to Bush’s vision of a democratic Iraq. Insecurity is rampant, the insurgency is out of control and the US and Iraqi forces are neither prepared nor equipped to stamp their authority on Iraq.

    Today Bush’s America finds itself increasingly isolated, devoid of any political objectives and desperate to spin any news that helps him perpetuate the lie that Iraq is stabilizing and democracy is taking root. Americans have decided enough is enough and have started to express their disapproval of Bush’s handling of Iraq.

    A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll showed that for the first time since the war began, more than half of the public believes that the U.S. invasion of Iraq had not made the America more safe, and nearly 40 percent described the situation there now as analogous to the Vietnam War. “The steady drip of negative news from Iraq is significantly undermining support for the U.S. military operation there,” noted Andy Kohout, director of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. The Pew poll also found an all-time high of 46 percent of the public favoring a withdrawal from Iraq. US politicians responding to public concerns are also voicing their support for withdrawing American forces from Iraq. According to a Gallup poll, some 72 percent of Democrats, 65 percent of independents and 41 percent of Republicans say they favor a partial or complete withdrawal.

    But the most damning piece of evidence that pours scorn over the Bush’s inflated projections about Iraq come from his military. “As early as July 2003 the US military lost its dominance in Iraq and is yet to regain that position”. This was the conclusion of a report authored by Maj. Isaiah Wilson, the official historian of the U.S. Army for the Iraq war. In addition, the report was highly critical of US civilian leadership as well as US war planners who worked under their supervision. The report states “U.S. war planners, practitioners and the civilian leadership conceived of the war far too narrowly…This overly simplistic conception of the war led to a cascading undercutting of the war effort: too few troops, too little coordination with civilian and governmental/non-governmental agencies and too little allotted time to achieve success”. So far the army has not endorsed the report as the official version on the history of the army in Iraq.

    Eschewing the endorsement of bad news, especially one that undermines Bush’s policies has been the hallmark of his administration. Any individual who opposes the vision set forth by the Bush administration are either ostracized or forced into early retirement by US army’s civilian leadership. Former army chief-of-staff Erik Shinseiki estimated in 2003 that a post-war occupation force would likely need to be several hundred thousand troops in size. Shinseiki was forced to retire not long after making his remarks. Another Army general John Riggs was forced to retire at a reduced rank, losing one of his stars, because he publicly contradicted Rumsfeld by arguing that the Army was over-stretched in Iraq and Afghanistan and needed more troops. Others have waited till retirement before speaking out against Rumsfeld; most notable amongst them is Marine Corps General Anthony Zinni.

    Recently, several serving officials decided to break rank with the Bush administration and voiced their own concerns over various aspects of military operations in Iraq. On 6/01/05 the commander of the US army reserve Lt Gen James Helmly said in a leaked memo that it [US army reserve] is rapidly degenerating into a “broken” force. He also said that the reserve has reached a point where it cannot fulfil its missions in Iraq and Afghanistan. The army reserve is a force of about 200,000 part-time soldiers who chose not to sign-up for active duty, but can be mobilized in time of need. Reservists account for about 40% of US troops in Iraq. The future of the army reserve is further compounded by the fact that it is falling short of its recruitment targets. On 6/3/05 in an article entitled U.S. Army Struggles to Coax Recruits Amid Iraq War published by Reuters, it was stated, “The army in February, for the first time in nearly five years, failed to achieve its monthly recruiting goal. It is in danger of missing its annual recruiting target for the first time since 1999 “. Commenting on shortfall Defense analyst Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute said that there has been a migration of recruits away from the ground forces toward services less likely to be in harm’s way in Iraq — the Navy and Air Force. “There’s a bottom line to the recruiting debate. People don’t want to die,” Thompson said.

    Differing accounts are also emerging between the US government and the army over the performance of the Iraqi insurgency. The Bush administration has always down played the insurgency by dismissing it as acts perpetrated by a small desperate minority who oppose freedom and democracy. In contrast the army’s appraisal of the potency insurgency appears to be more accurate.

    In May 2005, the New York Times reported Lieutenant Colonel Frederick P Wellman, who works with the task force overseeing the training of Iraqi security troops. He said that the insurgency doesn’t seem to be running out of new recruits, a dynamic fuelled by tribal members seeking revenge for relatives killed in fighting. “We can’t kill them all”, Wellman said. “When I kill one I create three.” General George W Casey, the top US commander in Iraq, expressed similar sentiments, calling the military’s efforts “the Pillsbury Doughboy idea” – pressing the insurgency in one area only causes it to rise elsewhere. This is an interesting about-face for Casey, as he said on March 9 that “the level of attacks, the level of violence has dropped off significantly since the [Iraqi] elections.” On 30/05/05 General Myers admitted that “lethality” of the insurgent attacks had increased.

    The claims by the military are substantiated by statistics. Data compiled by the Brookings Institute supports the US army’s assertion that Iraq is becoming more chaotic and deadly by the day. For instance, as of May 2005, the average number of U.S. troops killed and wounded in Iraq was 77 and 615 per month, respectively. A year ago, those numbers were 42 and 584. At this time last year, there was an average of 52 insurgent attacks per day. As of May 2005, there were 70 per day.

    The increasing tensions between the Bush administration and the military top brass prompted the army to leak stories about the mistreatment of prisoners at Guantanamo and other prisons. The Newsweek story about the discretion of the Quran was intentionally leaked by the military to make itself heard. Even after the White House pressurized Newsweek to retract the story, the Pentagon further embarrassed the White House by releasing a report to the media that catalogued several incidents of Quran abuse against detainees.

    As a result of this mounting pressure the Bush administration has been forced to admit that the situation in Iraq has worsened. On 14/06/05 in an interview with BBC, Rumsfeld was asked whether the security situation in Iraq had improved and responded by saying “statistically, no”. On the same day Cheney also conceded that Iraq had compromised America’s ability to conduct wars elsewhere. But despite these admissions the administration is still reluctant to come out and clearly say in public that America has been defeated in Iraq and must retreat from the war zone.

    This means that the tensions between the US military leadership and the Bush administration will continue to simmer, especially since military operations are having no effect in tampering the insurgency or improving the security situation in Iraq. The Bush administration is now faced with two choices, either reinstate the draft or withdraw from Iraq. Both options are humiliating for Bush, but only one option will save the US military from further bloodshed and that is America’s retreat from Iraq.

    This is because the US army is not prepared or equipped to fight asymmetrical wars. America’s military machine prides itself on the use of over-whelming force against the enemy. But against fighters backed by popular support such tactics do not deliver tangible results. Rather they only serve to alienate the population from the occupation force. In the battle of Fallujah, America used the largest concentration of conventional firepower, since World War 2, but could not quell the insurgency. Similar battles have taken place elsewhere in Iraq and the results have been very disappointing. US military chiefs know that the military cannot continue to function like this and are relying on the White House to bail them out. The trouble is that Bush has also run out of political solutions and now faces an uncertain future.

    One thing is for sure that while America has failed to turn Iraqis against the insurgency, the insurgency has succeeded in turning the American public and the military against the Bush administration.

    Did you like this article?

       

    Awesome, share it:

    Share Tweet Google Plus LinkedIn

    Thanks!

    Thanks for getting in touch with us.

    Click here (New window) to subscribe to our Newsletter

    • TAGS
    • about
    • abuse
    • according
    • account
    • accounts
    • accurate
    • achieve
    • administration
    • Afghanistan
    • after
    • aftermath
    • against
    • agencies
    • always
    • America
    • American
    • americans
    • amongst
    • annual
    • another
    • anthony
    • appraisal
    • around
    • article
    • asked
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Pinterest
    WhatsApp
    Linkedin
    ReddIt
    Email
    Print
    Tumblr
    Telegram
    Mix
    VK
    Digg
    LINE
    Viber
      Previous articleLynching on Exhibit
      Next articleTwice Fooled – Shame on us: The case for Impeachment
      Abid Mustafa

      Abid Mustafa is based in the UK and specialises in Muslim affairs. He contributed this article to Media Monitors Network (MMN).

      RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

      The Flower - Pakistan Monument at Night

      Supreme Court’s attempt to destabilize the government of Imran Khan

      United Kingdom

      Britain’s Chief Rabbi is helping to stoke antisemitism

      Benjamin Netanyahu

      Is Netanyahu ready to inflame war to escape his legal troubles?

      MMN @ Google Play Store MMN @ Amazon Appstore

      MMN @ TwitterMMN @ FacebookMMN Feed

      Newsletter

      EDITOR PICKS

      The Flower - Pakistan Monument at Night

      Supreme Court’s attempt to destabilize the government of Imran Khan

      December 1, 2019
      United Kingdom

      Britain’s Chief Rabbi is helping to stoke antisemitism

      December 1, 2019
      Donald Trump

      Trump Is Dismantling the International Order

      December 1, 2019

      POPULAR POSTS

      167

      The Origin of Freemasonry: The Crusaders & Templars

      April 23, 2003

      Sharon to Peres: We Control America

      November 20, 2001
      Qibla - Kaaba

      Direction of Al-Qiblah

      February 23, 2003

      POPULAR CATEGORY

      • Perspectives13564
      • Columns1205
      • Articles859
      • Platform37
      • Poetry12
      • Literature7
      Media Monitors Network (MMN)
      ABOUT US
      Media Monitors Network (MMN) is a non-profit, non-partial and non-political platform for those serious Media Contributors and Observers who crave to know and like to help to prevail the whole truth about current affairs, any disputed issue or any controversial issue by their voluntary contributions with logic, reason and rationality.
      Contact us: [email protected]
      FOLLOW US
      • About MMN
      • Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Contact
      Copyright © 2000 - MMN International Inc. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
      ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
      MORE STORIES
      The Flower - Pakistan Monument at Night

      Supreme Court’s attempt to destabilize the government of Imran Khan

      December 1, 2019
      United Kingdom

      Britain’s Chief Rabbi is helping to stoke antisemitism

      December 1, 2019