Sign in
  • Home
  • Perspectives
  • Articles
  • Columns
  • Platform
  • Poetry
    • Literature
  • Shop
    • Cart
    • My account
  • Give
    • Donation Confirmation
  • Contribute
Sign in
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
Search
46.3 F
Los Angeles
Monday, December 16, 2019
  • Sign in / Join
  • Contact MMN
  • en English
    af Afrikaanssq Albanianam Amharicar Arabichy Armenianaz Azerbaijanieu Basquebe Belarusianbn Bengalibs Bosnianbg Bulgarianca Catalanceb Cebuanony Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)co Corsicanhr Croatiancs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englisheo Esperantoet Estoniantl Filipinofi Finnishfr Frenchfy Frisiangl Galicianka Georgiande Germanel Greekgu Gujaratiht Haitian Creoleha Hausahaw Hawaiianiw Hebrewhi Hindihmn Hmonghu Hungarianis Icelandicig Igboid Indonesianga Irishit Italianja Japanesejw Javanesekn Kannadakk Kazakhkm Khmerko Koreanku Kurdish (Kurmanji)ky Kyrgyzlo Laola Latinlv Latvianlt Lithuanianlb Luxembourgishmk Macedonianmg Malagasyms Malayml Malayalammt Maltesemi Maorimr Marathimn Mongolianmy Myanmar (Burmese)ne Nepalino Norwegianps Pashtofa Persianpl Polishpt Portuguesepa Punjabiro Romanianru Russiansm Samoangd Scottish Gaelicsr Serbianst Sesothosn Shonasd Sindhisi Sinhalask Slovaksl Slovenianso Somalies Spanishsu Sudanesesw Swahilisv Swedishtg Tajikta Tamilte Teluguth Thaitr Turkishuk Ukrainianur Urduuz Uzbekvi Vietnamesecy Welshxh Xhosayi Yiddishyo Yorubazu Zulu
Sign in
Welcome! Log into your account
Forgot your password? Get help
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Media Monitors Network (MMN) Media Monitors Network (MMN)
Media Monitors Network (MMN)
  • Home
  • Perspectives
    • Disappearing Palestine

      Dugard: ICC Prosecutor Bensouda biased in favor of Israel – Unwilling…

      Myanmar/Burma: Little hope for Rohingya IDPs

      Suu Kyi – the Bama Supremacist

      Beirut - Lebanon

      Regime not listening to the people and future of Lebanon at…

      Taj Mahal - India

      The CAB is a Trap by BJP to Divide and Rule…

      Taj Mahal - India

      Modi’s Hindutva Goals Collide With India’s Destiny

  • Articles
    • Man studying religious book

      Ishmael and Isaac: An Essay on the Divergent Moral Economies of…

      Mahmoud Abbas

      May Your Home Be Destroyed

      Netanyahu Lighting Hanukah Candles with His Wife and Sons

      Bibi’s Son or: Three Men in a Car

      The Map of Greater Israel

      The Man Who Jumped

      West Bank - Palestine

      Cry, Beloved Country

  • Columns
    • Jerusalem Cityscape

      Overlooked Congressional Rebuke of Trump’s Position on Israeli Settlements

      Democrats

      Will the Democratic Presidential Nomination Be Bought?

      Jerusalem Israel Palestine Dome of The Rock Golden Dome

      A Second Nakba in the Making

      Joe Biden

      Kerry’s Endorsement of Biden Fits: Two Deceptive Supporters of the Iraq…

      Bernie Sanders

      For Corporate Media, It’s ‘Anybody But Sanders or Warren’

  • Platform
    • Hanukkah Lights

      Hanukkah is not hypocrisy

      The Washington Post

      “Preemptive war could risk millions of casualties. But….”

      When they shout: "We strongly condemn…"

      68

      Why Iran won’t attack Israel

      Is One Iraqi’s Self-Hatred Newsworthy?

  • Poetry
    • Literature
  • Shop
    • Cart
    • My account
  • Give
    • Donation Confirmation
  • Contribute
Home Perspectives A Commentary on United Nations Security Council Resolution 1397
  • Perspectives

A Commentary on United Nations Security Council Resolution 1397

By
James Zogby
-
March 19, 2002
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Linkedin
ReddIt
Email
Print
Tumblr
Telegram
Mix
VK
Digg
LINE
Viber

    James Zogby’s Column

    Last week, I read two diametrically opposed editorials in the Arab press, both commenting on the U.N. Security Council’s passage of the U.S.-supported Resolution 1397. 

    One of these editorials enthusiastically endorsed the event terming it “historic” and noting that it “presents an unprecedented opportunity for achieving peace in the Middle East.” The editorial went on to urge the Palestinians and the Arabs, in general, to unify behind the principles of peace and normalization in order to make it clear that the current leadership in Israel is the main reason for the continuing conflict.

    The opposing editorial identified U.N. Security Council Resolution 1397 as part of a larger U.S. effort to calm Arab public opinion in order to lay the groundwork for an assault against Iraq.  This editorial urged the Palestinian and Arab leadership to withhold cooperation from all of the U.S.’ regional efforts, including the current Zinni mission.

    Let me note from the outset that I agree with elements of both editorials.

    The observation of the second piece may very well be correct.  It may be true, as some Arab papers have speculated, that the sudden U.S. interest in reengagement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was not prompted by concern with the sufferings of the Palestinian people.  It appears that U.S. interest was prompted by another concern.  Vice President Richard Cheney’s mission to the Middle East, ostensibly to mobilize support for U.S. efforts against Iraq, was in danger of being derailed by Arab anger at Israel’s brutal tactics.  It may very well be true that U.S. policy planners realized the need to tamp down the Israel assaults and calm down the overall conflict in order to allow Cheney’s mission to proceed.

    Adding fuel to the fire of those who might question the U.S. intentions has been the actual timidity of the U.S. response.

    First, Secretary of State Colin Powell simply questioned whether or not Israel’s Prime Minister Sharon had examined whether his tactics against the Palestinians were working.  Then President Bush described the Israeli assaults as “not helpful”.  These two almost innocuous comments, however, were enough to spur the New York Times to editorialize against Sharon and generate other headlines like “Bush Rips Sharon”.  They also landed me an invitation to debate a congressman on CNN.  Our topic: “Has the Bush Administration gone too far in pressing Israel?”  Strange indeed!

    While U.N. Security Council Resolution 1397 does give formal recognition to a fact already universally recognized-that a final Middle East peace will include a Palestinian state-critics may be right in noting that it does little else.  As the Syrian representative to the Security Council correctly noted, Resolution 1397 “did not take into account any Arab concerns”.  It ignores the Israeli occupation and the death and destruction being meted out by Israeli occupation forces.  As a result of these concerns, the Syrian representative abstained from voting on the resolution.

    Meanwhile, if press reports are true, General Zinni has come to the region armed only with a U.S. proposal, once vetoed by Israel, to place a few dozen monitors in the West Bank and Gaza to do nothing more than report on future ceasefire violations.  This proposal, it may be recalled, was the final watered-down version of the original Palestinian request to have an international peacekeeping force stationed in the occupied lands to provide both protection and security for the Palestinians and Israelis. 

    And so, as I have noted, it may well be true that the observations of the second editorial written are correct-a timid but calibrated U.S. response to Israel’s assault designed only to calm Arab anger and create a less violent status quo in the Israeli-Palestinian situation.  But even with that, the conclusion offered, “to withhold support” is counterproductive and will do nothing to ease the suffering of the Palestinians or advance the cause of a just and lasting peace.

    Because obstructionism and abstentionism are never winning strategies and because the Palestinian struggle will never be won militarily, I find the tactics suggested by the first editorial to be far more supportable.

    In fact, the passage of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1397 provides Palestinians with the opportunity to throw back at the U.S. their oft repeated mantra “words are fine, but it’s actions that count”.  Passing Resolution 1397 was easy, making it real will be the real test of leadership.  To accomplish that will take more than a handful of monitors and mild rebukes.

    What the first of these two editorials also establishes is that there is a positive and constructive role for Arab leadership to play at this stage.  What is needed is a strategy designed to win the political and diplomatic battle.   A victory on this front can isolate Sharon and his hardline party, transform the political landscape in Israel and make a renewed and real peace process possible. 

    That strategy, of course, has, at its core, what has come to be termed as the “Abdullah initiative”.  Even though the initiative has not been fully developed and publicly launched, it has already shown real promise.  In Israel, it has generated a lively and quite striking discussion.  Just three examples of this internal Israeli debate will suffice to demonstrate its importance and the potential of the initiative.

    First, an observation from one of Israel’s leading political analysts, Aluf Benn.  He writes: The greatest danger for Sharon is that the Israeli left will recover from the Camp David fiasco, will unite around the Saudi initiative, and will present a political and diplomatic alternative that appeals to the U.S. Administration…The internal pressure will increase if the initiative receives the backing of the Arab League at the end of the month, even in a softened version, which will push Israel into the role of rejectionist.

    An editorial in Ha’aretz noted: Sharon is now painting a false portrait of an existential war of ‘no alternative’ in which the one and only goal is to survive.  That is deception.  It is not the existence of Israel that is at stake, but the existence of the settlements, which Sharon has fostered and nurtured for a generation.

    And finally, the Knesset Speaker Avraham Burg, building on this issue of the settlements and their relationship to the Abdullah initiative, wrote a striking editorial in Maariv:

            If the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the heart of the dispute between the Arab countries and us, its total solution is the heart of a total settlement between the Arab countries and us.  All the settlements for all the peace.  All the settlements means dismantling all the settlements, with great national pain and a zero option.  All the peace means an open borders agreement between all our surroundings and us.  All the peace and all the settlements together means Israel’s rescue from degradation, from the end of democracy, from the transfer and a discriminatory state.  It’s not a bad offer at a good price.  We must adopt it before we all become orphans.

    Quite simply, a serious debate has begun-in the U.S. and in Israel.  Prompting it have been frustration over the continuing violence, Sharon’s overreaction and brutal response to the violence, and the still-infant Abdullah initiative.

    The Arabs’ path forward is clear-to pocket U.N. Security Council Resolution 1397 as a victory and to build on the political success won so far by the Abdullah initiative.  Arabs can and should remain wary of any aspects of the war on terror that threaten to create regional instability.  They should remain focused on solving the region’s most pressing issue-the question of Palestine.  In this effort, they have tremendous power and resources: the strong commitment of their people, and near universal good will of the international community.  The targets to change are U.S. policy and the Israeli government. 

    These objectives can best be accomplished by serious political engagement.  The second editorial got it wrong.  The first editorial was right.

    Dr. James J. Zogby is President of Arab American Institute in Washington, DC.

    Did you like this article?

       

    Awesome, share it:

    Share Tweet Google Plus LinkedIn

    Thanks!

    Thanks for getting in touch with us.

    Click here (New window) to subscribe to our Newsletter

    • TAGS
    • abdullah
    • accomplished
    • account
    • achieving
    • actions
    • adding
    • administration
    • adopt
    • advance
    • against
    • agree
    • agreement
    • allow
    • almost
    • already
    • alternative
    • American
    • analysts
    • anger
    • another
    • Arab
    • Arab League
    • Arabs
    • armed
    • around
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Pinterest
    WhatsApp
    Linkedin
    ReddIt
    Email
    Print
    Tumblr
    Telegram
    Mix
    VK
    Digg
    LINE
    Viber
      Previous articleAn Apology
      Next articleMideast: The Iraqi Connection
      James Zogby

      Dr. James J. Zogby is President of Arab American Institute in Washington, DC and a regular contributor to Media Monitors Network (MMN).

      RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

      Disappearing Palestine

      Dugard: ICC Prosecutor Bensouda biased in favor of Israel – Unwilling to deliver Justice for Palestine

      Myanmar/Burma: Little hope for Rohingya IDPs

      Suu Kyi – the Bama Supremacist

      Beirut - Lebanon

      Regime not listening to the people and future of Lebanon at crossroad

      MMN @ Google Play Store MMN @ Amazon Appstore

      MMN @ TwitterMMN @ FacebookMMN Feed

      Newsletter

      EDITOR PICKS

      Jerusalem Cityscape

      Overlooked Congressional Rebuke of Trump’s Position on Israeli Settlements

      December 16, 2019
      Disappearing Palestine

      Dugard: ICC Prosecutor Bensouda biased in favor of Israel – Unwilling...

      December 15, 2019
      Myanmar/Burma: Little hope for Rohingya IDPs

      Suu Kyi – the Bama Supremacist

      December 15, 2019

      POPULAR POSTS

      167

      The Origin of Freemasonry: The Crusaders & Templars

      April 23, 2003

      Sharon to Peres: We Control America

      November 20, 2001
      Qibla - Kaaba

      Direction of Al-Qiblah

      February 23, 2003

      POPULAR CATEGORY

      • Perspectives13571
      • Columns1210
      • Articles859
      • Platform37
      • Poetry12
      • Literature7
      Media Monitors Network (MMN)
      ABOUT US
      Media Monitors Network (MMN) is a non-profit, non-partial and non-political platform for those serious Media Contributors and Observers who crave to know and like to help to prevail the whole truth about current affairs, any disputed issue or any controversial issue by their voluntary contributions with logic, reason and rationality.
      Contact us: [email protected]
      FOLLOW US
      • About MMN
      • Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Contact
      Copyright © 2000 - MMN International Inc. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
      ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
      MORE STORIES
      Jerusalem Cityscape

      Overlooked Congressional Rebuke of Trump’s Position on Israeli Settlements

      December 16, 2019
      Disappearing Palestine

      Dugard: ICC Prosecutor Bensouda biased in favor of Israel – Unwilling...

      December 15, 2019