The Moral Legitimacy of Israel
by William James Martin
On September 2, 2001, I sent off a letter to some 16 senators
and 6 congressmen stating:
The conflict which is ongoing in the Middle East, which is
more and more being referred to as a War, is too big and too
dangerous to be ignored. Every American is potentially
endangered by an increase in the violence. It is not that
difficult to imagine a scenario in which a nuclear explosive
devise came into play.
The Middle East problem is not going to disappear as long as
Israel continues to occupy and subjugate the Palestinian people.
The Palestinian people of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have
been living under occupation, deprived of dignity and basic
human rights for 34 years. When will it end, and how will it
end? Treaties have been signed, but Jewish settlements continue
to be built and the basic human rights of the Palestinian people
continue to erode, along with their homes and property.
I wrote these line in an attempt to warn that American were
endangered because of America’s year in - year out sponsorship of
violence taking the form of our uncritical support of the aggressive
policies of the Israeli government and for our passivity in the face
of the continued occupation of Arab lands and of the transfer of
those lands to the proprietorship of Israel. This violence could not
be contained in the Middle East indefinitely but eventually had to
intersect the lives of Americans, as it did on Sept 11. And this
threat is not just in the past, but continues and grows stronger
when each day brings further subjugation and humiliation of the
Palestinians, and greater anger and frustration for the 300 million
Arab people and 1.2 billion Muslims in that part of the world.
The letter was ignored.
Obviously, the danger has not abated since then, as the violence
in the Middle East has grown exponentially since Sept 11 with an
average of 2.2 Palestinians being killed per day; that’s
approximately one killed every five hours. And in the last week, the
rate of growth of the killings of Palestinians is as yet un-computed.
As I write these lines, Israelis have for the second time within the
month invaded Ramallah and the major Palestinian cities of the West
Bank and have taken over and largely destroyed Arafat’s compound, as
I am sure you all know. I understand he is hold up in a few rooms
with a machine gun at his side surrounded by other members of the
Palestinian Authority and by unarmed internationals who have come to
help shield him from injury or assassination. Sharon has indicated
several times in the last month that he wants Arafat dead, and has
been given a green light Cheney, but not, however, by Bush.
As we speak today, most of Ramallah has been without water for 6
days with only intermittent electricity. Doctors and medical
personnel have been killed or wounded, ambulances have crushed by
Israeli tanks, and those ambulances and medical personnel which have
survived have been prevented from traveling to the wounded and
dying. There are reports of un-reclaimed corpses decaying in the
streets and in peoples homes. There are widespread reports of small
scale massacres. People are trapped not only in their homes, but is
small sections of their homes which they deem to be the safest. For
most people food is running out, caused in no small part because
Israeli soldiers have looted the supermarkets. There are reports of
Palestinian civilians being used as human shields by the IDF.
Plans for a massive invasion have appeared in the press for more
than a week; the invasion was not a response to the wave of suicide
bombing in Israel which began with the this past Wed, the first day
of Seder, as is advertised by Sharon and the Israeli government – it
was planned before.
In fact on Mon, March 24, the Washington Posted reported:
JERUSALEM, March 24 – As the United States tries to mediate a
truce in the Middle East, Israeli military planners are
preparing for a major assault on Palestinian cities, towns and
refugee camps that would be broader and deeper than the
offensive.
If the talks fail as Palestinian violence continues, there is
widespread and growing support both in Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon's government and in the army for what one official called
a "comprehensive military confrontation" with the Palestinians.
This was three days before the suicide bombing in Netanya which
occurred on the first day of Seder and took the lives of 22
Israelis. CNN does not seem to have noticed.
That Israel is only defending itself is a familiar line. Israel
has managed to take over and control all of Palestine, but somehow,
Israel is the victim. In 1946 – 48, Zionist armies, under the leader
ship of Yatshak Shamir and Manachem Begin, massacred Palestinians in
some 500 villages, including Dayr Yassin, on which the noble Albert
Einstein has commented, with disgust. In the process, some 750,000
Palestinians were driven or fled from their homes into Gaza, the
West Bank and surrounding Arab countries.
In the 1948 War, we are told that little David Israel was the
subject of an unprovoked attack by an overwhelming Goliath Arab
army. Israeli apologist fail to mention that the fighting took place
on the Arab side of the line of demarcation separating the Israeli
state from the Arab state as proposed by the UN Security Council
Resolution which called for the creation of both states west of the
Jordan River of about equal areas. Nor is it mentioned that the
Israeli army out- numbered the Arab armies by about two to one, and
also possessed superior equipment and fire power.
Similar remarks can be made about the 1967 War in which Israel
attacked Egyptian forces in the Sinai and then Jordanian forces
though Israel was never seriously threatened . The ‘67 War was a war
for the possession of all of Palestine and the Sinai, including
Sharm -el –Shek.
The June 1982 invasion of Lebanon, which took place in the
diplomatic vacuum created by the departure of President Carter from
office, was Sharon’s war, and was an effort to destroy the PLO..
Within a nine month period preceding the invasion, there had been no
rocket attacks on Israel from across the Lebanese border owing to a
ceasefire worked out by US Envoy Phillip Habib The war in Lebanon
was a war for the possession of the West Bank and the occupied
territories and had nothing whatsoever to do with Israeli security
as advertised by the Israeli government.
Commentators have spoken to the failure of Sharon to have clear
objectives and an exit strategy for the current invasion. The
objectives are clear to him, and there is no exit strategy because
there is no exit intention, though the Israelis may be forced to
exit. The objective is to crush the Palestinians along with the
Palestinian Authority, to induce as much suffering as possible for
the Palestinians, to eliminate Arafat, if Sharon can get away with
it, and to consolidate Israel’s hold on the land so deeply coveted
by every true Zionist, of which Sharon is certainly one.
To the point that Israel is always the victim, even while it is
expanding its frontiers as it crushes its Palestinian victims, I
would like to add that as a racist, apartheid state, founded on
terrorism, massacres and ethnic cleansing, it has no moral right to
exists. Israel’s leaders who have been its heads of state – Begin,
Shamir, Sharon, etc are not George Washingtons and Thomas Jeffersons
– are terrorists who thrived on massacres of defenseless
Palestinians. Together they have as much blood on their hands as
some of those in the upper levels of the Third Reich. And because of
its history of brutality driven by a vision of racial purity and
racial superiority, it has no more right to exist than did Apartheid
South Africa and Rhodesia.
What is happening now has nothing to do with fighting terrorism.
The decision by Sharon for a final solution of the Palestinian
problem is a major push for the fulfillment of the Zionist program
to create an exclusively Jewish state in ALL of Palestine. That has
always been Sharon’s program and that expansion is intrinsic to
Zionism and to the Jewish state. Expansion into all areas of
Palestine has occurred as much under Labor governments as under
Lukud. Twice as many Jewish settlers moved into the occupied
territories under Barak than under his Lukud predecessor, Natanyahu.
Liberals who called for the dismantling of the state of South
Africa because it was based on White supremacy need to explain their
slavish devotion to the maintenance of a racially pure Israel.