by Hanan Mondo
If you were to over wash a T-shirt or a brain you
would get the same results of fading, shrinkage and distortion. To go
beyond a certain point of cleanliness is mere compulsive behavior. To go
beyond a certain point of indoctrination is brainwashing.
The dehumanization of Palestinians by
Israel and its supporting media is not mere name-calling of two-legged
beasts", "serpents" and "crocodiles". It is an Israeli policy. It is the
most important aspect of the Palestinian Israeli conflict.
If Palestinians are not considered to
be exactly human, then in effect there is no other party to the
conflict. Israel can do anything to that party to the conflict it
conceives of as being an "it".
The supporting mass media of such a
policy has gone beyond indoctrination. Instead of being the eyes and
ears and mouth of the masses, it has become a major contributor to their
apparent blindness, deafness and muteness.
Of all the stories that dehumanize
Palestinians in the media, an often-drilled story is both exemplary and
is most crucial. It is the story that claims Palestinian mothers do not
grieve the loss of their children.
A "Mother" is the ultimate symbol of
humanity, love, compassion and ‘unconditional love’. If you kill the
symbol you kill all related images. If you shake a basic fundamental
universal human conception of what a mother symbolizes, all related
concepts fall. If Palestinian mothers are far removed from this symbol
and all its related associations, then there exists a whole society with
abnormal mothers who do not grieve the loss of their children. In other
words, the mass media has announced the discovery of a "new species"
called Palestinians.
The often-drilled story in the media
goes like this:
Palestinians in general and
Palestinian mothers in particular are not exactly human. While cats
protect their kittens and dogs grieve the loss of their owners,
"Palestinian mothers send out their children on the streets" to be
killed by unarmed Israeli soldiers. Every morning, these mothers, each
gives her children a map of the hotspots and a list of the funerals for
that day. They give them two bags of stones; one to throw at the Israeli
soldiers and the other to throw at the peace loving settlers.
The story goes on to say that how
these Palestinian mothers think is unique in the history of mankind. The
mothers "entice their kids to become martyrs". All these children’s
fathers are "activists". Many of these fathers got killed by Israeli
soldiers. Some were killed by "rubber" water guns, others by "pinpoint"
plastic arrows. Many of these children’s elder brothers are in Israeli
prisons and many more of their younger brothers were exempted from doing
prison service because they were rendered handicapped.
The story goes that while
experimenting with Jesus Christ "nail bullets" trying to modify them to
modern use, they self inflicted life long injuries. Many daughters had
miscarriages because it is common amongst Palestinian to sniff
"depleted" cooking gas.
These mothers do not have the means
to support their many children. One less mouth to feed is not such a bad
idea.
According to the story in the media,
Palestinian mothers want their children to become martyrs. Since by
becoming martyrs, there is this added bonus of either the Israeli
soldiers or the settlers demolishing the old house the family inherited
from forefathers. The mothers have always hoped to live in barren
fields. If the child becomes a martyr, the soldiers would only make the
mothers’ dreams come true. The story concludes that when Palestinian
mothers hear they have lost a child to a sniper bullet by an Israeli
soldier, the mothers ululate. Palestinian mothers do not grieve the loss
of their children.
If you believe this often-drilled
story in the mass media about Palestinian mothers, you believe anything
and everything about Palestinians. If you believe this story, you
believe that if Palestinian mothers do not care about the loss of their
children why should you care if you hear of Palestinians killed by an
Israeli while praying in a Hebron mosque? Why should you care if you
hear that Palestinian policemen were killed by Israeli soldiers while
having a meal or while asleep? Why should you care if an Israeli soldier
kills any Palestinian child if his own mother does not care?
If you believe this story of the
media that dehumanizes Palestinians, you will also believe when the
media tells you that an orange with an orange color is a red apple after
all. If you do not believe that all mothers grieve the loss of their
children, then you are at the receiving end of a not so delicate brain
washing cycle.
Yes, many mothers ululate when told
that an Israeli soldier killed their child. But "only a shipwrecked
person who has just escaped drowning could understand the psychology of
someone who breaks out in laughter just because he is able to breath".
(Kobo Abe, "the woman in the dunes") All human beings try to find a
meaning for death and a way to come to terms with death of loved ones.
I have no doubt in my mind, none
whatsoever that all mothers Palestinians and Jewish grieve endlessly for
the loss of their children. Given the situation that Palestinian mothers
live under Israeli occupation, the mothers try to give some meaning and
dignity to the meaningless and undignified killing of a child. By
calling her child a martyr the mother almost redeems the act of the
Israeli soldier that is beyond redemption.
The mother wants to believe that her
child was killed for a good cause. So why do Palestinian mothers allow
their children to be on the streets? The answer is very simple. Schools
are almost always shut. There are no Parks. They neither own computers
or Nintendos. There are no soccer or tennis camps. There are no winter
skiing or summer cruising trips. There aren’t even children’s school
trips to Israel.
For an underprivileged Palestinian
child there is the ball and there is the street. Normal children between
the ages of eight to twelve play ball in the streets or on the moon if
there is no place on earth to play. Normal mothers allow children to
play ball outdoors. If the situation is an occupation that seems to be
never ending, are we to assume that Palestinian children should stay
indoors for that duration or go outdoors and get killed?
Children are "enticed" to attend
funerals by Israel and not by their mothers, as many media stories
claim. Palestinian children by the age of twelve have already eye
witnessed many killings, house demolitions, land confiscation and olive
trees bulldozing. When Israel cuts off a village by digging a trench
around that village it is not something that can be hidden or ignored?
It means restriction of movement and supplies in or out of that village.
Almost all Palestinian children have
experienced the death of a father a brother or a relative. If a
Palestinian child is killed while attending a funeral or likewise, other
children either will be in that funeral or learn about it through media
coverage. It is no secret therefore that Israeli soldiers are targeting
children. By the age of twelve, Palestinian children already know the
meaning of occupation and humiliation.
All Palestinians want to end Israeli
occupation, children included. If they get killed for their belief of
what must end and for the liberation of Palestine, they can only be
called martyrs. If a Palestinian mother ululates, it isn’t because she
is not grieving the death of her child it is because she feels that her
child was sacrificed for the liberation of Palestine.
You do not have to be a psychologist
or a sociologist to question the validity and truth in the claim that
Palestinian mothers do not grieve the loss of their children. Assuming
you have a small dose of humanity, curiosity and interest and you read a
recipe that tells you to mix vodka, garlic and ink. You would rightly
ask a simple question how come? If you read something that tells you to
digest a formula of a mother, a child’s death, and no grieving you would
be wrong not to ask how come?
The supporting media of Israeli
policy of dehumanizing Palestinians while stunting and immobilizing
their readers and audience are mobilizing both the Israeli and the
Palestinian people into the most dangerous cycle of all other cycles,
that of hatred. Israel can sedate and put down any member of the open
Zoo it thinks it has created. It can remove the caretaker of that open
Zoo it thinks it has installed. But "you just can’t mishandle creatures
and expect success."(Toni Morrison, "Beloved") Neither the Israelis nor
the Palestinians are going to disappear. What makes Israel and its
supporting media think that if the Jews survived the holocaust the
Palestinians will not?
In promoting the dehumanization
policy of Israel, mass media has gone beyond indoctrination. There are
ethics in wars that dictate, although killing is unethical there are
certain ethics to being unethical. Must you kill you shall not mutilate.
Must you mutilate you shall not bulldoze bodies. Must you roll on tanks
you shall not wish you had those victims for "breakfast". Must you do
all that make sure the victims are not ultimately your cousins or
brothers. In exactly this same manner, there is a code of ethics for the
mass media that for reasons of profit, pressure or pleasure has to be
unethical. Must it omit, distort, or twist the truth; it shall not go
beyond indoctrination. For beyond indoctrination is going a step further
beyond dehumanization.
Source: